Walk away from EPA: Time to reclaim development
The EPA pose the most severe test for the future relevance and viability of the ACP group, with serious implications for the collective and individual development prospects of its member-countries and peoples.
“The Summit is being held at a time of growing discontent amongst ACP members”, said Maureen Penjueli, Coordinator for PANG.
“Public events such as these are being held in Africa, the Caribbean, Europe and here in the Pacific to send a strong, clear message to the EU as well as politicians in Accra that the EPA falls well short of it’s development aims and in some cases undermines it”. “The EPA in its current form seeks to open markets around the globe to European corporations, with Europe standing to gain at the expense of some of the poorest countries in the world”.
The details of the EPA proposed by the European Commission on behalf of the European Union and the methods employed to bully and manipulate ACP countries to initial and sign those agreements, undermine the EU's claim that it is most interested in development in the ACP countries. Papua New Guinea and Fiji initialled an interim agreement on goods-trade at the end of 2007, under threat of a dramatic increase in tariffs on tuna and sugar exports to the EU and potential jobs losses for thousands.
At the recent trade negotiations in Brussels it emerged that vital issues for developing Pacific countries such as infant industry clause and export taxes will not even be negotiated until the region negotiates on services and investment. This despite the fact that the Pacific had formally written to the European Commission earlier this year to suspend negotiations in services and investment because the Commission failed to show the flexibility needed to enable PACPs to be genuine service providers in the EU market in the near future. In addition there are indications that the Commission will use the divide and rule strategy to get negotiations started on services and investment in the Pacific with at least one Pacific Island country indicating interest in negotiating services and investment.
“A partnership implies equal exchange yet while our governments have already conceded to the Commission’s demands for reforms, to reduce tariffs, the Commission continues to make demands bringing into question whether this is a genuine partnership”, Penjueli added. “There is no legal basis to begin negotiations on services and investment and it would be unfortunate if one of our own did break the regional decision to suspend negotiations on services”.
“Our governments are now our last hope to ensure that they defend our development interests and their strength lies in negotiating as a block. If the Commission fails to genuinely negotiate than our leaders must as a region have the political courage to walk away from a bad deal”.
For Further information please contact:Maureen Penjueli: + (679) 973 8828 or 9466 776 For further information: www.pang.org.fj
Source: PACNEWS
News feature
There are no related media to this article.