- News Feature : Facing epidemic of amputations and death, Pacific Islanders fighting diabetes [26/05/2019 - French Polynesia]
- Business News : PNG Government agencies put on notice [26/05/2019 - Papua New Guinea]
- News : Sir Julius Chan says he is not acting Prime Minister [26/05/2019 - Papua New Guinea]
- News : PM must resign now: Marape [26/05/2019 - Papua New Guinea]
- News : Low turnout in French territories for EU elections [26/05/2019 - New Caledonia]
- News : Marise Payne reappointed Australia's Foreign Affairs Minister [26/05/2019 - Australia]
- Sports News : Fiji crowned champions in London [26/05/2019 - United Kingdom]
- Sports News : Fiji with England, Ireland and Argentina in Paris [26/05/2019 - United Kingdom]
- News Feature : Health ministers focus on the needs of the most vulnerable [26/05/2019 - Switzerland]
- News Feature : Torres Strait Islanders ask UN to hold Australia to account on climate ‘human rights abuses [26/05/2019 - Australia]
- Business News : Cook Islands targets gold standard for tuna products [26/05/2019 - Cook Islands]
- Business News : Faleolo International Airport uses first aerobridge [26/05/2019 - Samoa]
- Sponsored : Oceania National Olympic Committees (ONOC)
The partnership between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group needs to change to remain relevant after 2020.
The European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) has released an independent political economy analysis study looking at the partnership that links 79 ACP countries with the EU, and mobilizes a large development budget of 30.5 billion euros.
The current partnership is over 40 years old, and is underpinned by the legally binding Cotonou Partnership Agreement (CPA), which will expire in 2020.
“Discussions on the future of the EU-ACP partnership beyond 2020 are currently in full swing, and the stakes are high. However, the relevance and the effectiveness of the partnership is being questioned,” explained Ewald Wermuth, Director at ECDPM.
ECDPM initiated this study with a view to promote an open and well-informed discussion.
The study found the current Cotonou Partnership Agreement’s framework is not well suited to cope with the new global development agenda, and has a limited track record on delivering on several of its core commitments.
“Rethinking the ACP-EU partnership is no time for business as usual. When this partnership was set up 40 years ago, it was groundbreaking. However, the real challenge now is to be as innovative as they were then, and find new arrangements that generate benefits for all parties that can hold for the next 20 years,” added Wermuth.
“What is lacking in this debate is solid evidence on the concrete practice of ACP-EU cooperation. A political economy analysis can help to address this gap, as it does not look at what is desirable, but at how things work out in practice and why,” explained Geert Laporte, Deputy Director of ECDPM.
The political economy analysis found:
* The ACP-EU Partnership has over time lost traction and the Cotonou Partnership Agreement (CPA) is now primarily an aid delivery mechanism with limited political and trade value.
*The overall performance of the ACP-EU partnership (beyond aid) has remained below expectations, and subsequent revisions have not been able to address a major implementation gap between the laudable ambitions and actual practices.
* Globalisation and regionalisation dynamics have severely affected the scope and capacity for collective action between the ACP and the EU.
* The added value of the ACP Group and the Cotonou Agreement vis-à-vis other key players (African Union and Regional Economic Communities) and political partnerships is increasingly unclear. ACP countries tend to ‘go regional’ to address their most pressing challenges.
* The ACP-EU framework is not suitable to effectively and efficiently address the universal 2030 Agenda: the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
As a result, it is doubtful that technical fixes, aimed at improving the implementation of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement, will suffice to revitalise ACP-EU cooperation. The relevance of the framework itself is the core issue – geographically, politically and institutionally.
Rather than following the path of least resistance and focusing on a limited reformulation of the existing agreement, the ECDPM study suggests that it might be in the interest of all parties in the EU and the ACP to jointly explore alternative options.
This could lead to more legitimate and solid arrangements, aligned to regionalisation dynamics and adapted to the international cooperation challenges of the 21st century.
Pacific Islands News Association
Who & What is PINA?
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
Media Helping Media